The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000. Measured in tonnes.
The line graph indicates the amount of 3 main energy sources produced by European continents over a 19-year period
Overall, there was an increase in the volumn of produced natural gas in 2000, up to 80 tonnes. On the contrary, European countries experienced a downward trend in the level of both petroleum and coal production at the same time
Petroleum originally had its highest level in 1981 at about 100 tonnes. Despite a stable period from 1984 to 1987, the figure fell sharply to 100 tonnes in 1989, and then began fluctuating in 1994 after being stable from 1988 to 1990. Meanwhile, the produced coal level experienced a sharp fall, from 80 to nearly 50 after stability over the first 3 years of the surveyed period . Despite a light rise from 50 to 70 tonnes, the figure has decreased considerably in the last 10 years.
It can be seen that the portion of natural gas remained stable, about 40 tonnes during the first 13 years before increasing and reaching 82 tonnes in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-30 | Haphuong204 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Thang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | michaelangelos | 66 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of types of magazines sold by the company in 1975 1995 and 2015 78
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 61
- Do you agree or disagree that celebrities are paid far too much money 67
- The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...the first 3 years of the surveyed period . Despite a light rise from 50 to 70 tonn...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74566473988 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53664515359 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624277456647 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.5118499796 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.833333333 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231926444499 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955270842333 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413187055075 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123996251264 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216217316745 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.