The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summqrise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the amount of various materials which used for recycling in a particular notion in given time period 1982 to 2010.
To commence with, it can be seen that in year 1982, the rate of recycling with paper and cardboard had always dominant for all years.Start with over three fifth and end with minor decline. This trend followed by Glass containers remarkably lower than Paper and Cardboard but considerately, higher than rest two materials, at half of the total percentage.The figure dipicts a stark contrast in year between 1986 and 1990 both methods fall slightly.
Furthermore, the rest two materials shows least proportion for recycling. Plastic did not recycled during the first two begining years and start recycling in 1990 with only 1%. The same trend followed by Aluminium cans but had great proportion in the end , at over two fifth.
Overall, it is immediately apparent that the recycling trend is that considerably more for paper and cardboard as compare to the rest three materials.
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summqrise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- In many parts of the world there is continous coverage of sports on television.some people believe this discourages the young from taking part in any sport themselves. 61
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbised. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.summar 84
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the united kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- Scientist predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a postive or negative development? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which used for recycling in a particular notion in given time period 1982 to 2010...
^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Start
...board had always dominant for all years.Start with over three fifth and end with mino...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'end' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'ends'.
Suggestion: ends
...l years.Start with over three fifth and end with minor decline. This trend followed...
^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...erials, at half of the total percentage.The figure dipicts a stark contrast in year...
^^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'shows the least'.
Suggestion: shows the least
...y. Furthermore, the rest two materials shows least proportion for recycling. Plastic did n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'recycle'
Suggestion: recycle
...oportion for recycling. Plastic did not recycled during the first two begining years and...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cans but had great proportion in the end , at over two fifth. Overall, it is im...
^^
Line 4, column 269, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'fifth' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'fifths'.
Suggestion: fifths
...eat proportion in the end , at over two fifth. Overall, it is immediately apparent...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10714285714 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7573964497 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4217599942 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11188220653 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633581728239 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572769046432 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827914169611 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625530732615 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.