The graph illustrates that how much recycling figures for four materials changed between 1982 to 2010 in a typical country. As is evident from the graph, the trend for all selected subjects was obviously upward, while the corresponding change for aluminum cans was outstandingly higher than others.
We can see that paper and cardboard had the greatest values used for recycling throughout the whole period. Although having initially increased to 80% in 1994, which was the peak level of the whole period, it experienced a steady drop to finish at 70% in 2010. Turning to glass containers, a reverse pattern was demonstrated. It dropped from the initial figure at 50% to 40% in 1990, before rising steadily to be recycled of 60% of available glass containers in 2010.
Regarding aluminum cans and plastics, a similar upward pattern is presented. Although the proportion of aluminum cans involved in recycling process rose significantly from around 2% in 1984 to just 45% at the end, plastics just witnessed a slower increase from 2% in 1988 to the lowest figure of 9% in 2010.
- Many university students live with their families while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages both situations? 89
- Every year several languages die out every year. Some people think that it is not important because life will be easier when there are fewer languages. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- It is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful. Architects shouldn't worry about producing building as a work of art. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01666666667 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80362970204 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644444444444 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3734491076 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.875 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212274241481 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867657271799 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998474701731 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139961096248 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566224704249 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.