The given lie graph compares the scale of various materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010. Overall, paper and cardboard were recycled at highest proportion among four in given 28 years period.
It is evident that paper and cardboard recycling were highest from beginning to the ending of period. Initially, in 1982 60% of paper and cardboard was reused but this number surge to 80% by the year 1992. Unfortunately, paper and cardboard recycling followed the negative trend up to 2010 and dropped its recycling scale. While, glass containers manufactured by half initially after 6 years the percentage plunged by 10%. Fortunately, in the next 22 years the glass recycling percentage rocketed to 60%.
Interestingly, aluminum cans recycling rate sharply increased in given period. In 1994 the aluminium recycling production was quite negligible whereas by 2010 the production uplifted to 45%. Whilst, plastic recycling was almost steady throughout the period.
- The Table below shows the results of a survey that asked 6800 Scottish adults (aged 16 years and over) whether they had taken part in different cultural activities in the past 12 months. 78
- Some people say that e books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magzines to what extent do you agree or disagree 42
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 56
- Today much of the food people eat gets transported from farms that are thousands of miles away. Some people believe it would be better for the environment and the economy if people only consumed food produced by the local farmers. Would the advantages of 78
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree?
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43046357616 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83483935995 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602649006623 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 14.7583874458 43.030603864 34% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.0 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256167651094 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106926673087 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101864331937 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196109444582 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11920260152 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.