The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Two line graphs illustrate the typical behaviour of radio listeners and tv viewers in the UK during 24 hours. The data is shown for the year 1992 and is provided in percentages of UK population for people older than 4 years.

The main feature that is immedeate apparent is the opposite tendency both curves exhibit. Whereas radio listeners peak in the morning, tv viewership is at its maximum in the evening and vice versa.

The relevant percentage figure for radio audiences at the peak value is just short of 30 per cent at around 8.30 am. Subsequently, radio listeners gradually decrease to nearly 0 per cent at 4 am. Nonetheless, a slight bump in radio audience is perceived at around 4 pm, where listenership jumps up a few percentages from around 12%. Simulary, a slight increase is also visible at around 10.30 pm, however to a lesser extent.

The tendency for tv audiences appears anti-correlated to radio audiences as foreshadowed earlier. While radio experienced a maximum audience at 8 am, tv viewership is about 6 times less at just 5 per cent. Contrarily, at 8.30 pm nearly 50 per cent of the UK population had turned on their tv, after which tv viewership drastically declined as night time approached.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, nonetheless, so, whereas, while, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87559808612 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95123402752 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588516746411 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.6134332272 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.6363636364 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101577497405 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465710492905 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315136472559 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063650715571 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00681484122346 0.0819641961636 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.