The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experienc

Essay topics:

The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

That population health is forecasted to be decreasing relative to current standards is a real possibility in light of growing societies and accompanying problems. A worldwide phenomena is the ageing population across all demographics, which hitherto is unprecedented in the history of mankind. At the same time the number of newborns especially in developing countries remain relatively high. In conjunction with a larger populace come complications of various kinds, one such complication is environmental damage and pollution.

As societies grow older, the strain on limited financial resources for the health sector grows significantly – a vast percentage of healthcare spending goes to older people leaving less resources for other patients. The remedy to this problem would of course be to allocate more resources for example to build more hospitals. However, there is not an unlimited amount of spending available to address all societal problems and hence painful decisions have to be made. These decisions result for instance in long surgery waiting lists; an infamous example here would be the seven year waiting time for hip replacement in some states here in Australia. Not getting care speedily certainly contributes to deteriorating health circumstances, which then appears in the statististics leading to the initial forecast that health overall is in decline.

On the other hand, as societies grow larger pollution increases -- more people simply means more of damaging microparticles in the air, more carbon dioxide, the prime contributor of the greenhouse effect, and consequently more health problems. With worldwide proposals for a ‘new green deal’ to holistically tackle global warming and to protect the environment, the discussions in the context of global warming also affect population health. However, so far, no decisive comprehensive actions have been taken and ‘laissez-faire’ is still the favoured modus operandi of most political actors in power.

I therefore strongly agree with the statement that the people’s health is likely to be diminished in the future vis-à-vis current health standards, owing to an ageing and larger population in conjunction with significant environmental complications. In my opinion, remedies can only work in a holistic framework, tackling global warming, pollution and providing specialised health care for an ageing population.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-26 geforce 61 view
2019-12-26 Lai Nhu Phuong 78 view
2019-12-16 phanduydat 89 view
2019-12-05 Abbas_one 73 view
2019-11-29 Hira Shaheen 84 view
Essays by user ralfs :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'phenomenon'?
Suggestion: phenomenon
... and accompanying problems. A worldwide phenomena is the ageing population across all dem...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 274, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... problems. With worldwide proposals for a 'new green deal' to holistica...
^
Line 9, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... warming and to protect the environment, the discussions in the context of global...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, for example, for instance, of course, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78272980501 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33931754505 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596100278552 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.9545027884 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.285714286 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6428571429 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144317750588 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467972007075 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440169878565 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875065417301 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449309528793 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.