The bar charts provide data eludicating on computer ownership between 2002 and 2010 as a fraction of the population and education level.
In both graphs a tendency of gradual growth in computer ownership is discernable. Overall, a larger fraction of people owned a computer by 2010 than in 2002. This tendency is also mirrored in the other chart, where a strong correlation is apparent between ownership and education level.
Looking at the graduation degrees in more detail, it is at first noticeable that the percentage for PC ownership increased more than fourfold for people without a high school diploma, from just above 10 per cent in 2002 to over 40 per cent in 2010. While not as dramatic, similar increases in ownership during the discussed 8 years is furthermore observed across all other education bands, which comprises high school, college (incomplete) and Bachelor’s degree. Nonetheless, as foreshadowed earlier, there is a strong link with education degrees and postgraduate levels have the largest percentage of PC ownership at nearly 90% in 2010, which is up by about 10% from 2002.
The numbers for the entire population reflects the popularity of computers, with just under 60% owning a PC in 2002, which reached nearly 90% in 2010.
- Many of the products we buy nowadays break or wear out very quickly. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this for manufacturers and the public? 56
- The flowchart shows the impact of deforestation. Summarize the information and present relevant facts, make comparisons where relevant 11
- Nowadays even more people are throwing things away that got broken and in the past people would try to repair these things instead of throwing away. Why do you think this is happening? What are possible solutions to this problem? 84
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Modern cultures around the world have become similar when compared to the past. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative development? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, look, nonetheless, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1756097561 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89965433128 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5650904473 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.625 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327834699401 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15313463656 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741695438074 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218548294713 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645416874411 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.