The graph below shows US consumers' average annual expenditures on the cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010.
The illustration compares the expanse of money per a year used by US citizens for mobile phones and fixed line services during 2001 up to 2010. As general trend, fixed line services experienced a noticeable decline, while it peer uplifted significantly throughout a decade.
To begin with, started with two hundred dollars expanded in 2001, the average of cost for mobile phone services in US continue to increase throughout a decade to reach the top, up to approximately 90 percent in the end of the given period. On the other hand, fixed line services seems to loss it favourable in the country year after year. As can be spotted in the previous line chart, the house phone experienced a graduate decline from just beneath seven hundred dollar in the initial period to four hundred dollar in the last sequence.
- The graph below shows US consumers' average annual expenditures on the cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010. 56
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014 56
- Formal exams are used to assess student at the end of each semester in many countries. Why are these exams used by school and universities? What are other types of assessments are possible? 61
- Some people say the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give your own opi 78
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 539, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ur hundred dollar in the last sequence.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 677.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 139.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87050359712 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43363162301 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66406675874 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640287769784 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.5355320542 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.4 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171794803232 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899966861787 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668025771419 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141383246931 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129099000668 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.