The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011.
The given line chart illustrates statistical data regarding national recycling rate in the US between1960 and 2011.
Overall, from the fleeting glance,it is vivid that,the striking feature the sharp rose in the total waste recovery as well as in the percentage of recycling in the same year over the period given of time.
It can be seen that, the total waste recovery in the first 20 years remained steady afterwards which showed gradual rise until next 10 years that accounted for 16.7million tons, then from 1985 to 2011, it rapidly climbed up and reached over 80 million tons at the end of given period.
Probing ahead,the percentage of waste recycling materials was approximately 5.6% in the year of 1960 by following years it showed slight rise in the garbage recycling until 1985 represented 10% furthermore,after the 1965,it witnessed significantly shot up till 1995 which was nearby 25% and this trend of recycling garbage was slow down and it showed slow rise which reached near about 34% at the end of the given period of time
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view |
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their country than other countries due to agree or disagree 67
- Nowadays more and more older people compete with younger people for the same jobs. What can be the reason for this? What would you as a solution? 89
- It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship. Do you agree? Why or why not? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 56
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011. 100
- Some people believe that students in school learn better when they learn in group whereas others believe students learn better when they study on their own.discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...11. Overall, from the fleeting glance,it is vivid that,the striking feature the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...rom the fleeting glance,it is vivid that,the striking feature the sharp rose in the ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...he end of given period. Probing ahead,the percentage of waste recycling materials...
^^^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , after
...g until 1985 represented 10% furthermore,after the 1965,it witnessed significantly sho...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 415, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... near about 34% at the end of the given period of time
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98285714286 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72104421733 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605714285714 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 22.4926829268 191% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 115.044284951 43.030603864 267% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 218.0 112.824112599 193% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.75 22.9334400587 191% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.25 5.23603664747 272% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238523388323 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138672315116 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0215049391582 0.0843802449381 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138672315116 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215049391582 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.9 13.2329268293 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.9970731707 175% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.