The graph below shows the way people of Somecountry invested their money during the years 2001 – 2006.
The bar chart compares two options of investment made by people in Somecountry in a 5-year period
Overall, it is apparent that stocks were always in favor of Somecountry’s investors when it comes to the stock market. Also, an upward trend was recorded in money spent on both bonds and stocks from 2001 to 2006
In 2001, 210 billion was paid for stocks while the figure for bonds was roughly half of that with 100 billion. However, after 2 years, bonds were seen with a significant rise of 57% when the money spent on stocks at the same time grew up with only 17% to 227 billion in 2003
The next year witnessed a surge of more than 60% from money on stocks, which then continued to rise up to reach its peak at 311 billion in the final year. Meanwhile, the figures for bonds just steadily increased from 162 billion in 2004 to 179 billion in 2005 and finally landed at 188 billion in 2006 which was only more than a half of which from stocks
- Some people believe that it is a good idea for older people to work if it is possible for them to do so Do you agree or disagree 61
- Road accidents are more frequent these days and claim many lives each year As a result some people suggest that drivers should take regular driving tests throughout their lives rather than one single driving test to improve the situation What do you think 78
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 67
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 93
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980s and 2010s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37853107345 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2356182777 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 22.4926829268 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.9099938663 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 193.75 112.824112599 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.25 22.9334400587 193% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135374623034 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866930714825 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477416944688 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104294822255 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627988743345 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.3 13.2329268293 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.66 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.7 10.3012195122 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.01 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.9970731707 178% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.