The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010.
The bar chart compares the amount of coffee produced in Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia, and Vietnam between 1990 and 2010.
Overall, only Colombia experienced a downward trend in its coffee production over the 20-year period, while the opposite tendency was seen in the other countries. It is clear that the amount of coffee manufactured in Brazil was by far higher than any other nation.
In the year 1990, around 0.7 million tonnes of coffee were produced in Brazil, whereas the figure for Colombia was slightly lower, at 0.6 million. The production of coffee in Indonesia and Vietnam were only 0.2 and 0.1 million tonnes in the same year, respectively. For the following 5 years, those two figures remained relatively unchanged, while Brazil saw an increase of 0.3 million and Colombia experienced a minimal drop to 0.5 million in their coffee production.
By 2010, the amount of coffee manufactured in Brazil had doubled to nearly 2 million tonnes. Similarly, Indonesia rose twofold and surpassed Colombia as the second-ranking country in terms of coffee production, with 0.4 million tonnes in 2010. The figures for the two other nations were similar, at about 0.3 million at the end of the period shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-09 | wholemilk | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | linhchang | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 95
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offenses are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 73
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both the 92
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, similarly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10606060606 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70415284477 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3766385366 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165112211753 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828845736752 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379224487381 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115280708605 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310609389487 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.