The graph gives information about the consumption of fast food (in grams per week), in the UK from 1970 to 1990.
The given chart illustrates the number of times Australian teenagers consumed fast food from 1975 to 2000.
Overall, despite starting at the highest figure, pizza's dominant position was taken by hamburgers at the end of the period. Moreover, while the amount of time eaten of burgers, fish and chips increase, THE FIGURE FOR pizza shows an opposite trend.
The figure for hamburgers consumption was similar to fish and chips at under 20 times in 1975. These two kinds of fast food experienced an upward trend in 25 years. In 2000, Australian teenagers ate burgers up to 100 times, higher than that in fish and chips proportion, with around 85 times.
Besides, the pizza total time eaten started at 100 times per year in 1975 but later fell significantly over 25 years despite an increase in the middle of the way. The number of times eaten of pizza then ended up at the lowest point in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | Tt617 | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | motobha | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | aldryan.wb | 61 | view |
| 2017-07-04 | lenguyenynhitk | 67 | view |
- Nowadays a large amount of advertising aiming at children should be banned because of the negative effects. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- The graph gives information about the consumption of fast food (in grams per week), in the UK from 1970 to 1990. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, moreover, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 751.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8141025641 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41634358175 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602564102564 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2242692554 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.875 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.066324261571 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351105104075 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450483891353 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0525201551037 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485004318407 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.