The graph illustrates the amount of energy for the production and consumption in the US from 1950 to 2000 and predicts statistics for 2025.
Overall, it is evident that the figures for US consumption and US production increased over the period from 1950 to 2000 and expected to constantly rise in 2025. Meanwhile, the energy needed for consumption was always higher than that for production.
In 1950, the US produced 25 energy units, lower than US consumption which accounted for 30 energy units. Those numbers grew dramatically to 55 energy units for US production and 60 energy units for US consumption. While US saw a significant fluctuation in the production and consumption of energy, the figures climbed during the period between 1975 and 2000.
Starting at 60 energy units in 2000, the production of US is expected to soar to 80 energy units in the final year. Similarly, US consumption is also expected in jump to the highest point of135 energy units in 2025, apart from a small reduction in the initial year.
The graph illustrates the amount of energy for the production and consumption in the US from 1950 to 2000 and predicts statistics for 2025.
Overall, it is evident that the figures for US consumption and US production increased over the period from 1950 to 2000 and expected to constantly rise in 2025. Meanwhile, the energy needed for consumption was always higher than that for production.
In 1950, the US produced 25 energy units, lower than US consumption which accounted for 30 energy units. Those numbers grew dramatically to 55 energy units for US production and 60 energy units for US consumption. While US saw a significant fluctuation in the production and consumption of energy, the figures climbed during the period between 1975 and 2000.
Starting at 60 energy units in 2000, the production of US is expected to soar to 80 energy units in the final year. Similarly, US consumption is also expected in jump to the highest point of135 energy units in 2025, apart from a small reduction in the initial year.
- The table illustrates the number of international tourists in the leading eight nations in two years 2009 and 2010 and the change It is evident that France was visited the most among other countries in both years While tourist arrivals in Germany increase 78
- The table illustrates how much money was donated to developing countries in the period 2006 2010 by US and EU charities to support technological development Overall it is clear that total aid increased during this period US aid was considerably higher tha 56
- There is a widespread saying that books and novels spur the imagination and language skills much more than any TV programme I believe that this notion holds true no matter what modern technologies are used on TV and TV media production The reasons are sim 84
- It is true that the quality of competitiveness is essential in almost societies Although there are several benefits from being competitive I believe that the drawbacks of this tendency cannot be overlooked On the one hand the development of communities ba 78
- The table illustrates the amount of money which is allocated in the US EU and other nations used in support of technology by charities over the period from 2006 to 2010 Overall it is evident that most of the countries experienced an increase during the gi 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94219653179 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82761190539 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485549132948 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.0312296814 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.875 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.705085252162 0.215688989381 327% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.366641824369 0.103423049105 355% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.227992426556 0.0843802449381 270% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.538720381375 0.15604864568 345% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.222689702231 0.0819641961636 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.