The graph shows the amount of fruit produced in four countries (France, Spain, Germany, Turkey) from 1970 to 2010
The line chart illustrates fruit production in four different countries between 1970 and 2010.
Overall, Spain had the highest amount of fruit manufatured in 40 years. It is worth noting that the figure for Turkey experienced an upward trend, while the opposite was true for Germany.
In 1970, there was around 5.6 million tonnes of fruit were made in Spain, which was more than double that of Germany. After that, Spain saw its fruit production increase and reach a peak of nearly 6.2 million tonnes in 1981 before decreasing gradually by about 1 million tonnes from 1981 to 2010. Meanwhile, the figure of Germany fall relatively from 2.5 million tonnes to 1.5 million tonnes between 1970 and 1990. Then, it nearly stayed remain over a period of 10 years before hitting the lowest point at around 1.25 million tonnes in 2010.
Regarding the remaining countries, the amount of fruit made in France was lowest in 1970, at approximately 1.2 million tonnes. It rose steadily by 1 million tonnes for the next 20 years. After that, this figure increased significantly and reach the highest point of nearly 3 million tonnes in 2010. During the given period, the fruit manufacture in Turkey rose gradually from 2 million tonnes in 1970 to 3.5 million tonnes in 2010.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In theie advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 73
- The charts below show the internet use in different purposes in Australia in 2010 2011 and the percentage by users Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95327102804 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42994698025 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523364485981 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1574381269 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3636363636 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243841240845 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109046147972 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744157799296 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172191251115 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514677847863 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.