The line chart describes the changing trends of the profits from four different cafes (The Tea Room, Internet Express, Wi-fi Cafe, and Cafe Cool) in New York throughout one full year, from January to December last year. The surveyed data was measured in Dollars. In overview, the patterns were uncertain over the year. One cafe, The Tea Room cafe, was reported to have a downward trend, while there were upward trends taken for three other cafes.
Initially, The Tea Room cafe became the highest revenue among others at the beginning of the year, with its number achieving by 160. Nevertheless, at the end of the year, there was a contradictory situation in which putting The Tea Room cafe as the lowest earning, recorded by about 40. That dramatic decrease happened with some increases in three different months, March, May, and October.
By contrast, three cafes with their low incomes in January experienced sharp increases over the year and took their rates as the top three cafes with the biggest profits. Regardless of that similar upward trend, those three cafes had some different details in several months of the year. From January to July, the income of Internet Express cafe gradually decreased by under 100 to around 80, while there was a steady increase in the trend of Wi-fi cafe's profit during the period, shown by above 40 to under 100. Differently, a fluctuating progression of monthly incomes from Cafe Cool was recorded by about 30 to under 40 over the same time. Furthermore, from August until December, Internet Express cafe and Cafe Cool underwent constant rises in the earning progression, by under 100 to under 140 and by under 60 until 120, respectively. Meanwhile, the revenue of Wi-fi cafe slightly reduced to about 60, and then jumped up to above 180, within the period.
- some people think that newspaper are the best media to learn and get information from while others believe that the internet is a better source discuss both views and give your own opinion 68
- The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 73
- The table below shows the numbers of people in each age group working in certain sectors in the UK in 1998 and 2006. 78
- The illustrations below show how coffee is sometimes produce. 73
- The graph below gives information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1990 and the present with projections to 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 49
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 33.7804878049 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 965.302439024 155% => OK
No of words: 304.0 196.424390244 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93092105263 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46837467342 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 106.607317073 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529605263158 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 283.868780488 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1260642079 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.307692308 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163724652119 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618261365281 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482514013336 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118390995724 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480006059675 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.