The graph shows information about the expenditure of energy in USA from 1980 and projection to 2030.
Overall, it can be seen that petrol and oil was the greatest change while the lowest one hydropower and it was calculated base on quadrillion units.
Petrol and oil experienced slight deep for the first year from 1980 stood at 35 quadrillion increased steadily two decades and touched 40 quadrillion.There was similar pattern between coal and natural gas, which rose up stably and reached same value around 23 quadrillion in 2005.While nuclear, solar and hydropower started from equal points under 5 quadrillion.Nuclear grew approximately 10 quadrillion and solar with hydropower back to the first amount in 2005.
The number of petrol and oil are estimated will use more energy in the future.From 40 quadrillion will climb 10 quadrillion during the projection period.Then,there is a dramatic jump will experience by coal which rise to 30 quadrillion in 2030, while natural gas will grow slowly to 25 quadrillion, and the last are nuclear, solar and hydropower, will spend around 2-3 quadrillions in first-two categories while hydropower tend stable at 5 quadrillions in 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | fikri hamdi khaira | 78 | view |
- nowadays it is true that raising the cost of petrol is the best way to reduce emission and traffic problems in the world. 80
- the data shows the average household in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 73
- The data which showed by graph explain the growth of population fron 1940 to 2000 in three districts which located in the U.S. state of oregon. 56
- The graph shows information about the expenditure of energy in USA from 1980 and projection to 2030. 78
- the data illustrate the ratio of different kinds of energy production of france in two years. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
... two decades and touched 40 quadrillion.There was similar pattern between coal and na...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...ame value around 23 quadrillion in 2005.While nuclear, solar and hydropower started f...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Nuclear
...d from equal points under 5 quadrillion.Nuclear grew approximately 10 quadrillion and s...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: From
...ated will use more energy in the future.From 40 quadrillion will climb 10 quadrillio...
^^^^
Line 9, column 154, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
...uadrillion during the projection period.Then,there is a dramatic jump will experienc...
^^^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...illion during the projection period.Then,there is a dramatic jump will experience by c...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3567251462 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31129474538 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643274853801 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 57.0 22.4926829268 253% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 148.023271444 43.030603864 344% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 305.333333333 112.824112599 271% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 57.0 22.9334400587 249% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0719778487791 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438053869207 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334732002298 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0438053869207 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334732002298 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 32.3 13.2329268293 244% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 22.08 61.2550243902 36% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.3 10.3012195122 236% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.7 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 24.8 10.9970731707 226% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.