The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010

Essay topics:

The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 – 2010.

The line graph compares three capital cities in terms of the number of international conferences hosted between 1980 until 2010.

Overall, it is abundantly clear that the number of international conferences both in City A and City B plunged over this period. In contrast, in City C, the number of such conferences saw a rapid increase until the year 2000.

In 1980, there were 35 international conferences in City A, compared with only 30 in City B. Despite corresponding fluctuations throughout the next twenty-five years, both city then met an equilibrium point in which 27 conferences were held in 2005. By 2010, conferences in City B had transcended the number in City A, with 26 and 24 international conferences respectively.

City C held no international conferences in the beginning of period. However, the city saw a consistent increase by 20 events in 1990, which then followed by a prominent escalation in the next ten years by 35 conferences. The figure remained the highest among all cities although it fell slightly to 31 conferences by the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-06-04 Hai Anh Phan Thi 73 view
2022-02-24 phuongchi17899 73 view
2022-02-07 Huy Vu view
2021-06-16 Chu Thị Hải view
2021-02-10 afidahlia 78 view
Essays by user afidahlia :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, then, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05586592179 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24072429187 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553072625698 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.84293594 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.555555556 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386412849613 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19152565049 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126710968702 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273249693071 0.15604864568 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118498192471 0.0819641961636 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.