The graph shows information about technology usage in the UK over time.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph shows the percentage of people adopting new technology within the UK in the course of 15 years from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, there was a widespread adoption of new technology during these years with high figures for using the Internet, having broadband at home and using social media. Moreover, despite appearing during the last 5 years, the ownership of smart devices experienced a dramatic growth.
The uptake of modern networking soared throughout the years. The internet users have tripled and social media users grew strikingly by 78%. The percentage points of broadband at home increased by 13 times within the first 10 years and then grew quite steadily in the next 5 years.
Hi-tech devices were frequently used from 2010 to 2015 although they showed no signs of usage during the previous years. The rate at which tablets were used rose by 10 times only in a short period, making it the highest usage frequency of the three. Smartphones also experienced a similar spike, rising by 3 times from 19% to 73%. Smartwatch ownership rate was the lowest, seeing a sluggish increase of 4%.
- The charts below show the average working hours per week of full time workers and part time workers in 3 countries and a comparison with the European average Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 67
- The graph gives information about the number of people in Australia who used Chinese Arabic Italian or Greek as their first mother tongue Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 90
- The chart below shows the proportions of types of magazines sold by a company in 1975 1995 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Comments
It includes a wide range of…
It includes a wide range of procedures, techniques, products, and systems intended to raise productivity, efficiency, and the standard of living for people. Visit Here: MyGuitarstring
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ial media users grew strikingly by 78%. The percentage points of broadband at home ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93548387097 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53136184857 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623655913978 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4074065608 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0964455645811 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356808912333 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412340720955 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636336603836 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476299706516 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.