The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary (Yen) from 1953 to 1983, and the prices of black and white television and colour television during the same period.
The line graph illustrates how the average monthly wage of Japanese and the prices of black and white television and color television changed over a period of 30 years from 1953.
In general, what stands out from the graph is that there was an upward pattern in the amount of the monthly wage during 30 years. By contrast, the amount of prices for two kinds of television experienced a downward trend in the same period.
The prices of black and white televisions were around 110,000 Yen per one in 1953 before experiencing a significant downward trend to 40,000 Yen. The color television started to sell in 1963, with 100,000 Yen for each. Over the following 20 years, the price of color television was higher than that of white and black one, under 50,000 Yen compared to 20,000 Yen.
The monthly wage which Japanese earned in 1953 was under 20,000 Yen. The price of one white and black television was more than five times as high as the monthly salary of the Japanese. By 1983, the figure for Japanese had experienced a dramatic upward pattern, a jump of 50,000 Yen.
- Competitiveness is a positive quality for people in most societies Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- Obesity is an increasing public health problem in some parts of the world Explain some possible reasons for this problem and suggest some solutions 67
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people say that subjects like arts music drama and creative writing are more beneficial to children and therefore they need more of these subjects to be included in the timetable Do you agree or disagree 61
- Should we allow GM Food Give reasons to support your opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71957671958 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40067084677 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502645502646 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7543778596 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1111111111 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465986592468 0.215688989381 216% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202102475524 0.103423049105 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107361919323 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309022667601 0.15604864568 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972627603862 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.