the graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an English town in 2012.
The figure elucidates amount of two genders of playing sports in an English town in 2012. At first glance, it is evident that in comparing to women, the number of males who played sports in 4 categories is higher rather than females.
To begin with the number of males, there was a dramatic range in between males and females who played football in which males are two times higher than the total of females who played it. Furthermore, it is also occurred for tennis and cycling where men are roughly 12% higher than women for tennis and approximately 15 in 100 higher than females for cycling. Nevertheless, hockey witnessed a small range in between these two genders in which females are still lower than males.
In contrast, females were higher in the other two sports instead of males. In badminton, women, which was at four-tenths, was significantly higher rather than men, which made up at 30%. Furthermore, the total of males who liked to swim, which accounted for just above 40 in 100, is considerably lower than females, which constituted at a half.
- the graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an English town in 2012. 73
- Some of people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. 61
- The maps summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016 84
- Divorce rates in Finland and Sweden. 84
- The pie charts below show recycling in Sydney, Melbourne and Worldwide. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... men, which made up at 30%. Furthermore, the total of males who liked to swim, wh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, still, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81967213115 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59866948686 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524590163934 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4691539803 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125815279413 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811219727104 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121207792594 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132700725752 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143166622854 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.