This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
The line graph describes the percentage of four various materials which were reprocessed in a specific nation between 1982 and 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that the savage process of Aluminum cans was gradually increasing from 1986 to 1998 and dramatically inclined rest of the period whereas, Plastics items were increased very slowly which was only 4% approximately.
In details, the reuse process of Paper and cardboard were initially in zigzag trend from 1982 to 1994 and rest of the period it was in declining mode but for the Glass containers the graph depicts the reverse situation that was initially in decreasing trend from the period 1982 to 1990 while rest of the period it was increasing steadily which was reached from 50% to 60%. In addition to that, Aluminum cans were increasing highest percentage of the four items that was about 5 percent to more than 40% while the Plastics were the lowest growing recycling product which was only 4% approximately.
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant example for this 61
- Is the internet bad for young people To what extent do you agree or disagree Write at least 250 words 61
- Is the internet bad for young people To what extent do you agree or disagree Write at least 250 words 61
- It will be better for society and individuals if driverless cars are widely used To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 84
- The chart illustrates the number of travelers to Ashdown Museum among the two consecutive years and the pie diagrams depict the visitor s satisfaction level during their visit in the museum before and after reconstruction during the same period 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s only 4% approximately. In details, the reuse process of Paper and cardboard were ini...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'increasing the highest'.
Suggestion: increasing the highest
...In addition to that, Aluminum cans were increasing highest percentage of the four items that was a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98773006135 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65545682305 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533742331288 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.1016840718 43.030603864 200% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 203.25 112.824112599 180% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.75 22.9334400587 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191556852131 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135779714834 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789308384919 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15474680968 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879457553497 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.4 13.2329268293 169% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.34 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.55 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s only 4% approximately. In details, the reuse process of Paper and cardboard were ini...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'increasing the highest'.
Suggestion: increasing the highest
...In addition to that, Aluminum cans were increasing highest percentage of the four items that was a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98773006135 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65545682305 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533742331288 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.1016840718 43.030603864 200% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 203.25 112.824112599 180% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.75 22.9334400587 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191556852131 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135779714834 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789308384919 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15474680968 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879457553497 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.4 13.2329268293 169% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.34 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.55 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.