The picture demonstrates the percentage of people aged 65 and over in Japan, Sweden and USA during 100-year period. Looking more closely to the chart, it can be clearly seen that a significant increase is observed for elder people.
According to the chart, the percentage of elder people in USA and Sweden were similar, until the intersection on 1995, Sweden’s number growth to 20 per cent while there was a period a stability in USA. However, both countries will have a surge again after 2025.
Nevertheless, Japan were the smallest number in 1940 at only 5 per cent. There was a little change about 30-year period. After that, a significant rise will be appeared after 2020 from 7 per cent to 10 per cent. Finally, the percentage of old people in Japan will be highest in 2040 with over 25 per cent of their citizen.
In conclusion, there have been a noticeable discrepancy in population age 65 and over by each country.
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The Charts summarise the weight measurement of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. 61
- The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming richer and the poor are growing poorer. What are the causes of this? what measures can be taken to reduce this problem? 78
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 42
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, nevertheless, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7962962963 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72546767708 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617283950617 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6342825916 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105333394457 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501448760174 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686507859348 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851005519009 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747397492246 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.