The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp

Essay topics:

The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The bar charts show data about computer ownership, with a further classification by

level of education, from 2002 to 2010.

A steady but significant rise can be seen in the percentage of the population that owned

a computer over the period. Just over half the population owned computers in 2002,

whereas by 2010 three out of four people had a home computer.

An analysis of the data by level of education shows that higher levels of education

correspond to higher levels of computer ownership in both of those years. In 2002, only

around 15% of those who did not finish high school had a computer but this figure had

trebled by 2010. There were also considerable increases, of approximately 30

percentage points, for those with a high school diploma or an unfinished college

education (reaching 65% and 85% respectively in 2010). However, graduates and

postgraduates proved to have the greatest level of ownership in 2010, at 90% and 95%

respectively, 20 percentage points higher than in 2002.

The last decade has seen a substantial growth in computer ownership in general, and

across all educational levels.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-01 welly 67 view
2019-11-25 sandeep kour 78 view
2019-11-16 RahulM 78 view
2019-11-13 Murodjon Mamadjonov 78 view
2019-11-07 marchjkd@gmail.com 67 view
Essays by user RahulM :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Level
...hip, with a further classification by level of education, from 2002 to 2010. A...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...rcentage of the population that owned a computer over the period. Just over hal...
^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e population owned computers in 2002, whereas by 2010 three out of four people had a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Correspond
...shows that higher levels of education correspond to higher levels of computer ownership ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Trebled
...ol had a computer but this figure had trebled by 2010. There were also considerable i...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Education
...hool diploma or an unfinished college education reaching 65% and 85% respectively in 20...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 29, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Respectively
... of ownership in 2010, at 90% and 95% respectively, 20 percentage points higher than in 20...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 35, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Across
...in computer ownership in general, and across all educational levels.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, whereas, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24864864865 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92691597204 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610810810811 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5894976346 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.375 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 15.0 3.83414634146 391% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315042203317 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135970188231 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459862844017 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101467150104 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562003449291 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.