The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The first graph provides information on computer ownership percentage between 2002 and 2010, While the second graph shows data on computer ownership by education level.
According to both charts the figures show a steady increase.
Firstly, in 2002 computer ownership was 58 per cent and in 2004 the figures rose to 60 per cent moreover, in 2006 the number of computer ownership obviously increase in 2008 to 65 per cent and finally in 2010 the number of computer ownership hit 80 per cent and the numbers keeps risen.
As long as computer ownership by education level is concerned between 2002 and 2010 the figures dramatically rose from 10 percent to 40 per cent however, the figures increase after highschool graduate to become almost 70 per cent which mean that the numbers of computer users keeps increase and for college users the number was 85 per cent and for bachelor’s degree also the numbers surge to 90 per cent, post graduate between 2002 and 2010 rise to 95 per cent
To sum up, generally the figures are grow between 2002 and 2010 and the numbers of the computer ownership or by education level are predicted to increase.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | welly | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | sandeep kour | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | RahulM | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | Murodjon Mamadjonov | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | marchjkd@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp 67
- TV Radio in the uk audience 61
- further education in the UK 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etween 2002 and 2010 rise to 95 per cent To sum up, generally the figures are gro...
^^^^
Line 13, column 38, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'grown'.
Suggestion: grown
... To sum up, generally the figures are grow between 2002 and 2010 and the numbers o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, moreover, second, so, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89795918367 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56410927871 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474489795918 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 49.0 22.4926829268 218% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 211.279879544 43.030603864 491% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 240.0 112.824112599 213% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 49.0 22.9334400587 214% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 19.5 5.23603664747 372% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269642709895 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190942161794 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158223707375 0.0843802449381 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194582106556 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145555520596 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.1 13.2329268293 197% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.0 10.3012195122 194% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.03 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 21.6 10.9970731707 196% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.