The graphs below show the age structure of a European country from 1901 to 1981 and a prediction for 2021

Essay topics:

The graphs below show the age structure of a European country from 1901 to 1981 and a prediction for 2021

The pie charts provide population figures and proportions of 3 age groups in a European country every 40 years between 1901 and 1981. A projection for 2021 is also included.

Over 8 decades from 1901, the general trend of an aging population was evident, which is expected to continue until 2021. Also, population figures are shown to have increased steadily and resume in the examined period.

In 1901, the vast majority of the population was aged less than 65 years of age, while those above 65 and 85 constituted only 5% in total. The same configuration was seen 40 years later, even though the population increased by almost a half to over 52 million people.

The year 1981 recorded a similar increase of 15 million people. However, in this year, despite being mostly represented by those below 65 (83%), the population was shown to age markedly. The figure for the above-85 group grew four times while that for those aged between 65 and 85 more than tripled to reach 13%. It is projected that in 2021, both groups will increase by 2%, leaving the youngest group occupying slightly less than 80%. The country is also anticipated to accommodate nearly 88 million people, maintaining the population growth over the fourty year interval.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-15 trpg143 78 view
2019-09-19 n0air9x9 84 view
2019-07-11 Thu Phung 67 view
2019-03-27 Tracy Nguyen 56 view
2019-01-26 tuanly 73 view
Essays by user n0air9x9 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lmost a half to over 52 million people. The year 1981 recorded a similar increas...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 574, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n growth over the fourty year interval.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94786729858 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58426419298 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60663507109 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7654415976 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9090909091 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20252133913 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830410249092 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064887497257 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147063536828 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769540618766 0.0819641961636 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.