The two charts give information about the cinema presence in Australia and the average cinema visits by distinct age groups between 1996 and 2000.
Overall, it is clear that the rate of cinema attendants tended to rise over time, while there was an opposite trend which could be seen in their frequency. Besides, the average cinema visits of four age groups fluctuated over the period.
In 1996, the percentage of people who went to the cinema accounted for 62%, the lowest proportion among years. The figure increased by 10% in both consecutive years and continued to remain stable until 2000 (at 72%), despite a slight drop in 1999, at about 70%. By contrast, there were about 10.3 average cinema visits in 1996, which was followed by a moderate growth to 11,1 visits in 1997, before falling significantly to 8,3 visits in 2000.
There were hardly any changes when looking at the average number of movie visits in four age groups over time. In 1996, 14-24 was the age that went to the cinema the most, at 15 visits. Next came 25-25, 35-39, and 50+ with figures at about 14 visits, 13 visits, and 10 visits respectively. In the following years, the figures fluctuated and rose slightly to nearly 18 visits, 17 visits, 15 visits, and 14 visits in turn at the end of the period.
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 84
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 84
- The graphs below show the cinema attendants in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 73
- The table below shows the expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: CONTINUE_TO_REMAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...ed by 10% in both consecutive years and continued to remain stable until 2000 at 72%, despite a sli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69333333333 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34629626706 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7047474401 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257539111287 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124547078437 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104977987823 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200635458692 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998730867349 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.