The bar graph indicates the expenditure ratio of the UAE government in education and healthcare between 1985 and 1993, whereas the line graph compares life expectancy and infant mortality rate in the UAE in 1970 with that of 1992. Overall, UAE administrator spent more ratio of their budget on education than they did on health care. The improvement Emiratis achieved to prevent child death cases was remarkable.
As the bar chart suggests, the UAE administration spent one-tenth of their GDP in the health sector in 1985 and their spending on public health was roughly 2% lower than that. After 5 years, 14% of GDP went on education which was almost double than the expenditure in health division. Interestingly, the UAE authority spent less ratio of their GDP in public health in 1990 than they did in 1985 but it went up to 10% in 1993. The funds for education went as high as nearly 15% in 1993.
The line graph delineates that Emiratis people’s life expectancy was 60 years in 1970 and it was extended to just over 70 years after two decades. Infant mortality rate, on the other hand, was quite high in 1970 (70 child death in every thousand) and it improved significantly during 22 years when it went as low as 20 per thousand.
- ome people give more importance to artists painter writers musicians in the current age of rapidly developing technology and science What do you think Do people prefer arts to technology in your view 89
- The table compares the production of carbon dioxide in five countries in 2017 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows the land used for organic crops in two countries between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The table below shows the percentage of household and electronic goods in New Zealand in 2002 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73271889401 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63214737275 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511520737327 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5955304792 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.111111111 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212599441953 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920720883342 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640970828946 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147042222241 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601579490886 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.