The graphs below show the global robotics market during 2000 and 2025 based on sectors. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The change in the global market of robotics in billions of dollars based on four different sectors from 2000 to 2005 is displayed in the bar chart and table.
Overall, the robotics market globally are expected to gain more and more popularity. Furthermore, the whole figures will experience an upward trend, but the most lucrative business was on Industrial sector, predicted to be popular year-to-year.
Initially, the robotics were less well-known, showing the size of global price at below 10 billion dollars, and the vast majority was the most sold in Industrial use at 4 million dollars. Meanwhile, dollars of military market was higher at 2 million than that of commercial usage at only one million. Then, individuals were no likely to utilize the robots.
Eventually, the robotics market universally will increase dramatically to almost 70 billion dollars, with the sales in Industries breaking the recorded as the highest, predicted to incline to 26 billion dollars. By 2025, commercials and militaries will interest in purchasing robots with the global market price at 16 and 15 billion dollars, respectively. When it comes to the amount of money in personal sector, it is envisaged to grow at only 9 billion dollars.
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location 84
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 84
- The pie charts below show the data regarding the time people spend on smartphones and tablets divided by category 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21105527638 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88252174192 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603015075377 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0437148949 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.222222222 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15869349873 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711411664501 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057776009918 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109732146729 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474709063369 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.