The graphs below show the post school qualifications held by Canadians in the age groups 25 to 35 and 45 to 55 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graphs below show the post-school qualifications held by Canadians in the age groups 25 to 35 and 45 to 55.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pie charts provide information about areas of formal education of Canadian citizens separated into two age categories (25 to 35 years old and 45 to 55 years old).

Overall, it is clearly seen that the number of qualified Canadians in considerably higher among younger people (515600 versus 213400). Also, degrees in social science and arts are most popular for both age groups.

Social science and arts account for one-fifth of diplomas held by people aged between 25 and 35. Similarly, these fields of study make up 21 per cent among degrees of older people. The second most popular category for the young is administration, comprising just under one fifth, while it represents only 15 per cent for older individuals. The portion of education degrees for 25 to 35 and for 45 to 55 aged citizens is 15 and 13 per cent, respectively.

Engineering diplomas constitute 9 per cent for younger people, in contrast, they represent 19 per cent for the older group. Figures for science, math and computers, however, show the opposite situation, contributing 18 per cent for the young and only 10 per cent for the old. The fraction of humanities, nursing, MBA and other is about 20 per cent, collectively, for both reported groups.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (7 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-13 Kshitij Kasabekar 73 view
2021-11-02 ghazaleh Basiri 11 view
2021-08-31 rajpatel90 72 view
2021-08-11 khuekhue 54 view
2020-07-26 vdrobny 87 view
Essays by user vdrobny :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, similarly, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95192307692 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76453595087 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581730769231 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7563438614 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119905005266 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580140252417 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055006518687 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848773611209 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519077416846 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.