he bar chart above shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The horizontal bar graph elucidates the information concerned to various popular nations intake and mass production of current measured in billion kWh in the year 2014.
Overall, the bar graph highlights the organization of famous ten countries according to their production and utilization of current levels over the time. It was observed from the graph, China and the United States depicted a significant proportion, whereas Korea republic was the least amongst all other nations in terms of generation and usage of current.
In the year 2014, China stood at top position in creation of current with 5,398 billion kWh, followed by the United States with 4,099 billion kWh, and the figures dropped dramatically for Russia, Japan and India with 1,057, 936.2 and 871 billion kWh respectively. In addition to that, a gradual decline was seen for Canada(618.9), France(561.2), Brazil(530.7), Germany(526.6) and Korea Republic(485.1).
Furthermore, the consumption level of these countries portrayed different numbers with respect to the production level, China and US noticed similar figures as the production with 5,322 and 3,866 units of electricity in 2014. On the other hand, a significant low utilization was witnessed for both India(698.8 ) and Canada(499.9) than generation of current units of about 871 and 618.9 individually. Similarly, the rest of the countries ebbed a little throughout the year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-06 | bangtaenie_77 | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-04 | sattar_iust | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-23 | Dister | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-09 | bluedandelion23 | view | |
| 2020-03-09 | bluedandelion23 | view |
- Today more and more people use robots to do tasks at home and at work Do you think it is a positive or negative development Why 89
- The map shows the plan of a library in 2001 and 2009 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- Some people think that environment problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 84
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...nformation concerned to various popular nations intake and mass production of current m...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... mass production of current measured in billion kWh in the year 2014. Overall, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red in billion kWh in the year 2014. Overall, the bar graph highlights the or...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of generation and usage of current. In the year 2014, China stood at top pos...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ermany526.6 and Korea Republic485.1. Furthermore, the consumption level of th...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...zation was witnessed for both India698.8 and Canada499.9 than generation of curre...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, similarly, whereas, in addition, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56279069767 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03563120083 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.1701777835 43.030603864 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.857142857 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7142857143 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13981690072 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066920096825 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470111045121 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888081641279 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285889384619 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.2329268293 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.56 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.