he chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words
The chart illustrates the comparison of the percentage science qualification in Malaysia and Singapore. The qualification divided into four degrees, such as master’s degree, bachelor’s degree, school leaving exams, as well as no qualification in science.
Overall, the highest qualification in these countries is no qualification in science which it gained more than 55% respectively and master’s degree is the undermost percentage which it reached less than 10% severally.
Furthermore, the highest no qualification in science and school leaving exams percentages is Malaysia, which it attained more than 60% and more than 30% severally. On the other hand, Singapore gained bachelor’s degree percentage up to 20%, higher than Malaysia which it just gained 10%.
Moreover, even though Singapore was positioned as the nethermost in no qualification in science and school leaving exams, albeit the gap percentage between Malaysia and Singapore just attained less than 10%. In contrast, the gap in the percentage bachelor’s degree between Singapore and Malaysia is old fashioned up to 10%.
- This pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features. 78
- The chart below gives information about birth and death rates in Switzerland from 1970 to 2020 according to United Nations statistics.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Some people say that sports play an important role in society. Others, however, think that it is nothing more than a leisure activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 to 2005. 67
- The line graph shows the percentage of Internet users in three countries from 1999 to 2009. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, in contrast, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84756097561 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44798068312 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451219512195 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3240059697 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5714285714 5.23603664747 240% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0674838115874 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472798681534 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494388014359 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0529613572753 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319119679568 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 61.2550243902 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 11.4140731707 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.