ielts cambridge 14
The bar chart provides information about the value of five different export commodities in a country, the datas are stated in billions. Meanwhile the table illustrates the rate differences of each categories. Those information are taken between two different time periods, 2015 and 2016
Overall, most of the commodities such as petroleum products, engineered goods, textiles, and agricultural products experience a growth. On the contrary, gems and jewellery seems to be the only category that suffer a decline.
Originally petroleum products is worth around 60 billions. Subsequently, its value increase 3% to a little over its original number. Moreover, Textiles are considered to be the product that experienced the most significant growth indicating an 15.24% rise from the previous year, its value rose approximately 9 billions.
In addition, agriculture products remain stable in the following year with an incline of merely 0.81%. Gems and jewellery seem to decrease, an 5.18% reduction from its initial worth of 40 billions. Furthermore, engineered goods is accounted for an 8.5% rise to a little over than 60 billions in 2016.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-02-22 | Vuong Chan Nguyen | view | |
2022-11-22 | kidwish123 | 11 | view |
2022-08-05 | chaiti123 | 11 | view |
2021-11-29 | Stony | 78 | view |
2021-01-15 | ambu | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...ntry, the datas are stated in billions. Meanwhile the table illustrates the rate differen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'Those informations'?
Suggestion: This information; Those informations
...he rate differences of each categories. Those information are taken between two different time pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, well, while, in addition, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51136363636 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08168325663 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647727272727 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0938896402 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.