Line Chart
The line chart indicates the yearly salary of three bakeries in Calgary between 2000 and 2001, measured in USD in 1- yearly intervals .
In general, as can be seen from the graph, income of Mari Bakeshop dropped, while both Amandine Bakery and Bolo Cakery rose. Although earnings of Mari Bakeshop were the highest in three bakeries at first, it was the lower the end of period.
In the first year, the annual earnings of employer’s Mari Bakeshop stood at 8000USD, then increased to about 9000USD in 2001. After 2005, it experienced a sudden plunge of 6000USD and continued fell around 4000USD in 2010.
At the beginning of period, in 2000, income of Amandine Bakery was initially almost higher than that for Bolo Cakery and remained relatively constant to around 6000USD for 4 years. After which it slowly grew to about 7000USD. Then, this figure jumped to over 10000USD in the end of period. In constract, yearly salary of Bolo Cakery was fluctuation slightly until 2002. The next year, it rose to 4000USD and comsistent grew to over 6000USD in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-05 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | khanhkhanhlhp | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | khanhkhanhlhp | 84 | view |
| 2024-07-24 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-08 | Vicky_2702 | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
..., measured in USD in 1- yearly intervals . In general, as can be seen from the g...
^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...constant to around 6000USD for 4 years. After which it slowly grew to about 7000USD. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87777777778 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39962248895 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9906567461 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.064415280604 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0251458037427 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754374112282 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0628645093568 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108884524199 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.