The line chart above compares the amount of old peoples who were 65 and over 65 years old from 1940 to 2040 in Japan, Sweden and America.
It is clear from the chart that three countries all had and will have more and more 65-and-over-year-old people. But only Japan’s old people tended to decrease in early 100-year period and will jump rapidly at the end.
By 1940, Japan, Sweden and United States had a percentage of 5%, 7% and 9% of people aged 65 and over respectively. Over 20 years later, Sweden and USA had the same pattern, rising up and reached 10% and 9% one by one while Japan figure fell to 3%. Whereas Japan kept moving unchangeable, USA climbed up with the same speed of Sweden to 15% and 14% in turn after 1980.
After that, America slightly went down, Sweden was up and Japan increased significantly. Experts predict that almost in 2040, all three countries will reach the highest points, particularly Japan will account for 27%, Sweden with 25% and USA with 23% of people who will be 65 and over 65 years old.
The line chart above compares the amount of old peoples who were 65 and over 65 years old from 1940 to 2040 in Japan, Sweden and America.
It is clear from the chart that three countries all had and will have more and more 65-and-over-year-old people. But only Japan’s old people tended to decrease in early 100-year period and will jump rapidly at the end.
By 1940, Japan, Sweden and United States had a percentage of 5%, 7% and 9% of people aged 65 and over respectively. Over 20 years later, Sweden and USA had the same pattern, rising up and reached 10% and 9% one by one while Japan figure fell to 3%. Whereas Japan kept moving unchangeable, USA climbed up with the same speed of Sweden to 15% and 14% in turn after 1980.
After that, America slightly went down, Sweden was up and Japan increased significantly. Experts predict that almost in 2040, all three countries will reach the highest points, particularly Japan will account for 27%, Sweden with 25% and USA with 23% of people who will be 65 and over 65 years old.
- The line chart above demonstrates the average number of people travelling long distances to work by car of public transports, bus and train in particular, in the UK from 1970 to 2030.It is clear that there were and will be significant changes in the numbe 73
- The table above demonstrates the proportion of the 7 problems faced by primary students from school A and B in 2005 and 2015.It is clear that school A faced more problems than school B in 2005, but a lot less than the proportion of 2015. However, school B 73
- The first line graph shows the average monthly spending on children’s sports by their parents from 2008 to 2014 while the second one presents the amount of children participating in football, athletics and swimming in the UK at the same time.It is clear 78
- The line chart above compares waste output in tonnes among 3 companies A, B and C from 2000 to 2005.It can be seen from the graph that both companies A and B witnessed the downward trend of waste output over 15-year period). In contrast, the amount of was 73
- The given graph illustrates how much waste is created by three companies over the course of 15 years beginning at 2000.Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that both companies A and B witnessed the downward trend of waste output over 15-year pe 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The line chart above compares the amount of old people...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58288770053 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53398079155 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7036719068 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.125 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.657618810865 0.215688989381 305% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.3055067586 0.103423049105 295% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.271803211769 0.0843802449381 322% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.463081609188 0.15604864568 297% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.225850396047 0.0819641961636 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.