The line chart above illustrates the population proportion at the age of 65 and beyond of Japan, Sweden and the USA in a-hundred-year time from 1940 to 2040.
It is clear that the population aged 65 and above ratio of Sweden and the USA shows around 50% similarity. But in general, the variations in the three countries are quite noticeable.
In 1940, the percentage value the population aged 65 in Japan was 5 percent, while that group of age accounted for about 7% in Sweden, and 8.5 % in the USA. In the next 20 years, the value increased by more or less than 1.8 % in Sweden and the USA while decreasing sharply to around 3% in Japan. The following 20 years saw a significant rise by 5% in the age 65 group in Sweden and the US. Contemporarily, the ratio remained stable in Japan.
From 1980 to 2020, the number of people in the age of 65 in the USA and beyond stay relatively constant, whereas while those in the other two countries climbed dramatically to about 10% of the population in Japan and 18% in Sweden. In the up-coming 20 years, this age-group of the three countries is predicted to rise significantly, especially that of Japan. This age-group proportion will probably peak at about 27% in Japan, and approximately 25 and 23% in Sweden and the USA by 2040.
The line chart above illustrates the population proportion at the age of 65 and beyond of Japan, Sweden and the USA in a-hundred-year time from 1940 to 2040.
It is clear that the population aged 65 and above ratio of Sweden and the USA shows around 50% similarity. But in general, the variations in the three countries are quite noticeable.
In 1940, the percentage value the population aged 65 in Japan was 5 percent, while that group of age accounted for about 7% in Sweden, and 8.5 % in the USA. In the next 20 years, the value increased by more or less than 1.8 % in Sweden and the USA while decreasing sharply to around 3% in Japan. The following 20 years saw a significant rise by 5% in the age 65 group in Sweden and the US. Contemporarily, the ratio remained stable in Japan.
From 1980 to 2020, the number of people in the age of 65 in the USA and beyond stay relatively constant, whereas while those in the other two countries climbed dramatically to about 10% of the population in Japan and 18% in Sweden. In the up-coming 20 years, this age-group of the three countries is predicted to rise significantly, especially that of Japan. This age-group proportion will probably peak at about 27% in Japan, and approximately 25 and 23% in Sweden and the USA by 2040.
- The line chart above shows changes in the average money spent every month on children’s sports by parents from 2008 to 2010. The following graph compares the number of children taking part in three different physical activities, which are football, athl 73
- he line chart above compares the amount of beef, pork, broilers and turkey, which the Americans consumed each year between 1995 and 2012.It is clear from the chart that both broilers and turkey flesh eating, increased significantly from 1960 to 2012 while 78
- The pie charts above depict the median ages of Yemeni and Italian citizens in 2000 and predictions in 2050.It is well-defined from the charts that kids, teenagers and adults under 60 years old account for most of Yemen’s population both in 2000 and 2050 73
- The line chart above gives us difference between world food and oil costs from 2000 to 2011. Generally, both food and oil prices increased steadily at the beginning of the period and picked up from 2008 to 2009. But only food price reaches top in 2011, ot 22
- The line chart above gives information on the figure for British city workers travelling every day to work by the three common kinds of transport from 1970 to 2030.It is clear from the graph that the quickly rising number of people who went and will go to 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The line chart above illustrates the population propor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while, in general, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56956521739 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79766283892 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486956521739 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6927667472 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.1 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.621586954836 0.215688989381 288% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.269288460432 0.103423049105 260% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.242418371141 0.0843802449381 287% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.471265971396 0.15604864568 302% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.200103447018 0.0819641961636 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.