The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000

Essay topics:

The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.

The graph provides an information consist of kind and quantity of fast food that Australian teenagers consumed in the period of 25 years. Overall, both hamburgers and pizza gain an upward trend while fish and chips obtain the contrary.

Pizza started near zero and increased gradually to around 40 before there was a sharp climb until year of 1995 and reach over 80 times eaten each year. After that, the graph went on a plateau until the end of period. Hamburgers experienced a similar trends as pizza. It started with the sudden increase for the first decade and half from around 10 to exceeds 80. Then it still increased but only slightly until the end of period.

On the other hand, fish and chips decreased moderately from a hundred in the first ten years. In the next decade, it experienced a significant climb almost hitting a hundred times. For the rest of period, it falling sharply until less than 40.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (6 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-30 baoquyen1906 78 view
2023-01-16 beobuic1 view
2023-01-16 beobuic1 view
2022-08-07 Taiwo Morounfolu view
2022-08-07 Taiwo Morounfolu view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'experiences'?
Suggestion: experiences
...first ten years. In the next decade, it experience a significant climb almost hitting a hu...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, still, then, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 743.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70253164557 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.343661571 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670886075949 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9720190166 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122769976794 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452612891497 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108449204879 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898429743718 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106012547965 0.0819641961636 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.