The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010.
The graph illustrated that the statistic of share price of outokumpu companies from January 2006 to December 2010. The share price of the companies should be accounted by euro. Overall, the uppermost share price happened in 2006 to 2007 which it gained more than 30 euros. On the other hand, from 2008 to 2009, the share price of outokumpu companies tend to nethermost than others which it just reached less than 10 euros.
Furthermore, the graph elucidated that from 2006 to 2007 the number of share price escalated significantly up to 15 euros. On the other hand, there are the decline slightly which occurred from 2007 to 2008, reached approximately 10 euros. In contrast, throughout the first mid 2008 the number of outokumpu companies share price gravitate to degenerated extremely, attained more than 20 euros.
Finally, from the second mid 2008 to 2010 the number of share price gravitate to fluctuate unexpectedly.
- Amount spent on consumer goods 78
- The charts below give information about world spending and population.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 to 2005. 67
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, second, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11184210526 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71504956006 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480263157895 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5700811569 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.125 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312650348651 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178879960597 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14056647182 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218194995077 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109822516659 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.