The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph provides the information about the regional household recycling rates of United Kingdom, France and Germany from 2005 to 2015.
Overall, the recycling rates of the United Kingdom and Germany showed a steady but significant rise over the 10-year period, while the percentage of recycling waste in France experienced a downward trend.
In 2005, the recycling waste of the Unites Kingdom and Germany were nearly 20% and 35% respectively. Germany had a steady increase from almost 35% in the beginning and ended up to more than half in 2015. Meanwhile, for United Kingdom, they experienced a minimal rise in percentage until 2009, wherein a very small number were added. After two years, a significant growth of more than one fifth is noted, then by 2015, they became the highest in recycling waste at 60%.
In early 2005, France were leading at 50% of the total household recycling rate, but experienced a downward trend until 2013 with a one in ten difference. Although after that year they started to increase, at the end of the period, they were still the lowest at almost 40% in total.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | neethujithin | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | neethujithin | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | SNEHA S.R | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | akva | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-16 | Thu Phung | 78 | view |
- The flow chart below explains how laundry is handled Using information from the flow chart describe the laundry process 80
- Smokers percentage of population 1950 1990 87
- In many countries TV programmes are available 24 hours a day Some people believe this has a positive outcome for people while others say the effect is negative Discuss both views and give your opinion 81
- Many people believe that international tourism is bad thing for their countries. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to change this negative attitude towards international tourism? 84
- the pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rienced a downward trend. In 2005, the recycling waste of the Unites Kingdom an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90909090909 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5669340448 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534759358289 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6145390297 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148299346435 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768229152067 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807749372248 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122111277566 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848585539258 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.