The line graph provides information on the percentage of tourists living abroad who visited Australia each year, and the table graph illustrates the countries from which the respective tourists originated.
Overall, the number of people visiting Australia for a time period of thirty years has experienced rapid growth with 30.4 million tourists in 2005. The majority of these people came from Japan, as opposed to China, which is the country with the lowest ratio of annual tourists in Australia.
The number of Japanese tourists has demonstrated a strong upward trend by peaking at 12 million people per year in 2005. Similarly, the ratio of visitors from South Korea and Europe has risen from 2.9 and 1.1 million respectively in 1975 to 9.1 and 4.5 million in 2005 accordingly.
In regards to Britain, the USA, and China the number of tourists originating from those countries was not increased on equal footing as it occurred to the above-mentioned countries. More specifically, only 2.9 million British, 1.1 million Americans, and 0.8 million Chinese have visited Australia in 2005.
- In many workplaces online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Sales week of October 7 13ImageYou should write at least 150 61
- The charts below show the percentage of time younger and older people spend on various Internet activities in their free time excluding email Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both theseviews and give your own opinion 73
- The bar chart below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities Derby and Nottingham Between 2000 and 2009 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...and 4.5 million in 2005 accordingly. In regards to Britain, the USA, and China the number ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26857142857 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81424945589 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4755534249 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.714285714 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225410301374 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107127247791 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650025991085 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145931430711 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596440132036 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...and 4.5 million in 2005 accordingly. In regards to Britain, the USA, and China the number ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26857142857 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81424945589 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4755534249 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.714285714 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225410301374 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107127247791 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650025991085 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145931430711 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596440132036 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.