The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from.
The table illustrates how many overseas residents visit Australia each year. The given line graph shows the number of visitors who came to countries over the period of 30 years.
Overall, it is clear that while Japan was the most attractive country, accounted for the highest number of travelers and China is the country that has the least visitors in both 1975 and 2005. The total of tourists was highest in 2005. Meanwhile, there were many overseas residents to Australia from 1975 to 2005.
Looking at the table, South Korea and Japan were the two countries that has the highest number of tourists visiting, at around 2.9 million and 3.2 million respectively in 1975. While Europe also has the third-highest number of visitors, at 1.1 million, in comparison with other countries, at under 0.5 million travelers. In the last year 1975, the total of visitors who travel to countries was 8.8 million. In 2005, most of the number of tourists visiting countries increased significantly. Japan, South Korea, and Europe were also one of the highest percentages, at 9.1 million, 12.0 million and 4.5 million respectively, in comparison with other nations were only under 3.0 million. In the last of 2005, the total of travelers visiting countries was about 30.4 million.
Looking at the line graph, overseas citizens who visit Australia was started at 10 million and continued to increase significantly to above 30 million at end of the period.
- The graph below shows the number of Computer and Internet users in different Arab countries 77
- Students are becoming more and more reliant on the Internet While the Internet is convenient it has many negative effects and its use for educational purposes should be restricted How far do you agree with this statement 56
- Students are becoming more and more reliant on the Internet While the Internet is convenient it has many negative effects and its use for educational purposes should be restricted How far do you agree with this statement 56
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantage of this development outweighs the disadvantages 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06276150628 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66620123971 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481171548117 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7298810696 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.833333333 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188742661691 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098383788354 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795552915801 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168043500611 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116311827883 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.