The line graph below shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The diagram illustrates how many men and women are cell phone subscribers in a city named Marysvill between 1995 and 2015. Overall, the tendency of both genders to buy cell phone has increased dramatically over a period of 20 years, although in the last ten years the number of women subscribers has fallen.
In the first year the number of women and men was almost similar as it was around 500 people for each gender. For next ten years women and men's trends grew considerably as they experienced a fivefold increase during these years. While the figure for men was unchanged between 2005 and 2010, the share of women showed a steady decrease and it reached about 22000 subscriber in 2010 and it then leveled off in the last five years. In contrast, there was a moderate rise in men's figures and it hit the highest point in last year as almost 27000 men were subscriber in 2015.

Votes
Average: 4.1 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 362, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'subscriber' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'subscribers'.
Suggestion: subscribers
...ady decrease and it reached about 22000 subscriber in 2010 and it then leveled off in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 571, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...most 27000 men were subscriber in 2015.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 727.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60126582278 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40630381065 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588607594937 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1699185444 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.166666667 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104781612997 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595016902349 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447206012077 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102541153806 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519432213795 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.