The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
As is illustrated by the line graph, depicts the information about the proportion of tourists to UK who visited Brighton between 1980 to 2010.
Taking a quick glance, it is quite evident that the favourite attraction were the pavilion and festival and in 1980 the least popular attraction was the pier but in 2010 this changed and art gallery was the least popular.
As can be seen from the graph, in 1980s and 1990s there was a sharp increase in visitors to the pavilion from 28% to 48% and then the percentage gradually went down to 30% in 2010. Moreover, the trend for the art gallery was similar to the pavilion and visitors increased rapidly from 22% to 37% from 1980 to 1985. The gradually decreased to less than 10% over the next 25 years. Moving further, the number of tourists who visited Brighton festival fluctuation slightly but in general remained steady at about 25%. Further more, visitors to the pier also oscillated from 1980 to 2000 then rose significantly from 12% to 22% between 2000 to 2010.
- In many countries the proportion of old people is steadily increasing. Some think this good, while other believe this a problem for a country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities. Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce traffic in big cities. 56
- Consumer good 56
- Level of participation 11
- Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities . Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce traffic in big cities . 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
...ular. As can be seen from the graph, in 1980s and 1990s there was a sharp increase in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ival fluctuation slightly but in general remained steady at about 25%. Further mo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72471910112 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50027772728 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7624113447 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155970614307 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789036580795 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969068822989 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136827098575 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993849151686 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.