The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant.
The given line graph illustrates the proportion of travelers to Scotland visiting four attractive scenes in Edinburgh from 1985 to 2010. Overall, there was a downward trend in the rate of visitors going to the castle and aquarium, while an opposite tendency was witnessed in festival and zoo.
As can be seen from the graph, there was a 25% growth in the percentage of tourists who visited the castle in the first 17-year interval (stared at 24% in 1980). The data plunged by nearly a half to over 30% in 2010. As the same as the tendency witnessed in castle, the proportion of visitors to aquarium reached a peak of 35% in 1985 (from 20% in 1980) before slumping to under 10%
Conversely, the figure for ravelers to festival stared at 30% in 1980 and decreased to 24% in 1995, after which there was an insignificant increase to 26% until 2000. A period of stability was seen in the rest of the given time span. As regards the zoo, the period from 1980 to 2000 observed a fluctuation between 10% and 15% in the rate of visitors, followed by a dramatical rise of 10% in the next 10-year duration.
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the salmon. Summarize the information by electing and reporting he main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 87
- The pie chart below show the share of Oscar winners by film genre for 2003 and 2008 72
- the pie charts below give information about household expenditure of an average US family in different years 86
- The bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emission in different countries during the three different years. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sitors to aquarium reached a peak of 35% in 1985 from 20% in 1980 before slumping...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53768844221 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57319799972 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537688442211 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.2237241845 43.030603864 200% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0959132747514 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522425849695 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873396876221 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0753565093958 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593487476031 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.