The pie chart below show the share of Oscar winners by film genre for 2003 and 2008.
The two pie charts given compares the proportion of oscar winners by seven film genre between 2003 and 2008.
As can be seen from the chart, there was an upward trend in the proportion of oscar film winners by 4 genres in the period between 2003 and 2008. The percentage of oscar winner in documentary rose by 2% from under 10% during this 5-year interval, in addition to a slight growth to 7% in the rate of Romance fil. The proportion of science fiction film doubled to approximately 15%, while a 15% rise to nearly a third in the rate of action was witnessed in the same period of time.
In contrast, an opposite tendency was evident in the rest over the same time span. Thriller, which was nearly a half in 2003, dropped by almost 10% to just over two third in 2008. The same movement was true in horror film, which had a fall from over 15% in 2003 to nearly a half (under 10%). The rate of comedy film being oscar winners remained stable between 2003 and 2008 at just over 5%.
In conclusion, documentary still came top of the list while comedy was on the other end of the scale from 2003 to 2008.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-19 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-19 | nobitaa | view | |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
- The pie chart below show the share of Oscar winners by film genre for 2003 and 2008 72
- the pie charts below give information about household expenditure of an average US family in different years 86
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the salmon. Summarize the information by electing and reporting he main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emission in different countries during the three different years. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'genre' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'genres'.
Suggestion: genres
...oportion of oscar winners by seven film genre between 2003 and 2008. As c...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... film genre between 2003 and 2008. As can be seen from the chart, there was...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 465, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ate of action was witnessed in the same period of time. In contrast, an opposite t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nessed in the same period of time. In contrast, an opposite tendency was ev...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...een 2003 and 2008 at just over 5%. In conclusion, documentary still came to...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
still, third, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45192307692 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23803111775 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504807692308 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0975371237 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300102001607 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150986477788 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142632646892 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226250591997 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137704258392 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.