The line graph compares three different countries in terms of the changing numbers of students who were admitted to Sheffield University over a period of four years from 2005 to 2009.
With similar upward trends, the number of qualified students who came from Iran and Turkey increased during the time and reach a peak in 2009. However, Greece performed a decreasing trend including several downslopes.
Started from the number of 40, which was 20 more than the figure in Turkey, Iran raised to 60 over about a whole year. After two years of steady increase, its figure rocketed to nearly 160 students. Unlike the sharp changes that happened in Iran, the climb of the number of Turkish students was comparatively slow with only an unnoticeable turning point in 2007.
Having a totally opposite trend, the number of students from Greece kept going down all the time, particularly between the year 2006 and 2007, which the figure slept from about 157 to 70. Till 2009, it reached a low of approximately 45.
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extend do you think this is a positive trend
- The line graph gives information about the number of Iranian Greek and Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extend do you think this is a positive trend
- In some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think it is a positive or negative situation 87
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this massage 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94152046784 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50686960142 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66081871345 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5372334714 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.625 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165778427876 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675443093802 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064243969613 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111296769543 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604646874081 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.