The line graph outlines energy consumption in the USA from 1980 to the present day, with further projections up until 2030.
The graph below compares the energy consumption rate by six types fuels in USA since 1980 and its estimation till 2030. Fuels which were reported consist of petrol and oil, coal, natural gas, nuclear, solar/wind and hydro-power. Units measured by quadrillion.
As it can be observed petrol and oil fuels have the most consumption rate from 1980 until 2030 (35-50 respectively), opposed to hydro-power fuel which have the lowest consumption rate among fuel in both 1980 and 2030 (around 3-2.5).
Based on the graph, nuclear and solar/wind fuels have experienced slowly increasing rate (3.5-7 respectively and 3.5-around 6). Also, it should be noted that coal and natural gas both, together have enjoyed an increasing consumption rate which coal proportion rises from just over 15 to just under 30, whereas natural gas consumption rate after three falls and rises from 20 reaches almost 25, a rises about 5 in comparison with coal which was almost 15.
It is also interesting that renewable fuels have a little progress in comparison with fossil fuels which experienced more energy consumption rate.
- The plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- opinions about communal online encyclopedias 81
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. 61
- Fatherhood ought to be emphasised as much as motherhood. The idea that women aresolely responsible for deciding whether or not to have babies leads on to the idea that theyare also responsible for bringing the children up 56
- Some people think that all university student should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a rise' or simply 'rises'?
Suggestion: a rise; rises
...ls and rises from 20 reaches almost 25, a rises about 5 in comparison with coal which w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22033898305 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70684563844 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621468926554 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 118.917922208 43.030603864 276% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.0 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179778783198 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092733614265 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822080994892 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124133342372 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363127080031 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.