Now days we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening?
What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
<p class="MsoNormal">Rubbish can be produced in a variety of ways. There are two
types of rubbishes in the environment namely recyclable and unrecyclable. Unrecyclable
litters according to their source production including domestic, industrial,
medical and etc. Industrial rubbishes have more portion than others since industrialization
was increased all over the world. With that in mind, it is no wonder why litter
production is increasing.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Waste management is a problem of controversy. Plenty of
research done to solve this problem but according to the newest report of a health
magazine, there is not a solution for it. Each kind of rubbish must be disposed
of in a certain way which causes no harm for the environment and any species. Some
litters are disposed of, as others are recycled and return to nature. For instance,
domestic rubbishes are burned in the burner machine which designed for this
purpose. <span lang="AR-SA" dir="RTL" style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-hansi-font-family:
Calibri;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span dir="LTR"></span><span dir="LTR"></span><span dir="LTR"></span><span dir="LTR"></span> It is immediately
apparent that there is not a certain way for some kind of rubbish. For example,
nuclear waste cannot be burned or covered by soil. On the other hand, they are
kept in the water until signification in contamination reduction. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">For wrap it up, I strongly believe that the government must
produce recyclable goods which lead to less rubbish production and an array of
problems, such as disease. Another thing to mention is that adopt strict resolution
for industrial rubbishes to make them produce more rubbish. Apart from this, allocating
main budget for waste management researches can lead to inventing new way for
waste disposal.<span lang="FA" dir="RTL" style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-hansi-font-family:
Calibri;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-bidi-language:FA"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 95 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | Ankita7443 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | priteshshah16 | 56 | view |
- people today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do? 60
- The line graph outlines energy consumption in the USA from 1980 to the present day with further projections up until 2030 47
- The table below shows the consumer durables (telephone, refrigerator, etc.) owned inBritain from 1972 to 1983. 67
- do you agree or disagree with this idea. technology decrease children creativity.give your reasons. 66
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and that all zoos should be closed. However, others think that zoos are useful for protecting rare animals.both views and give your own opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 9, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ncluding domestic, industrial, medical and etc. Industrial rubbishes have more portion ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , sans-serif
...tyle='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;mso-asc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 30, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , sans-serif
...tyle='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;mso-asc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, another thing, apart from, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2284.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 8.30545454545 5.12529762239 162% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 12.3773453408 2.80592935109 441% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610909090909 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.3 1.60771543086 143% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 143.543938298 49.4020404114 291% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 152.266666667 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 29.0 4.38176352705 662% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0832408794124 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572387318828 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650319776906 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0377173714591 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646381840633 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.9 13.0946893788 205% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -6.01 50.2224549098 -12% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.6 11.3001002004 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 30.92 12.4159519038 249% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 31.0 10.7795591182 288% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.