The line graph shows burglaries per thousand vehicles in four countries between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given line graph illustrates the information about thieved vehicles in four countries between 2000 and 2009. Units are measured in numbers.

It can be clearly seen from the graph that Great Britain have maximum burglaries vehicle and Greece is dramatically increased day by day. In addition, Spain and Norway showed a variation in downward direction.

Taking into consideration of numbers, Great Britain showed some fluctuation in 9 years two times it hit the highest point in 2002 and 2006. Greece stayed constant upto 4 years after that it showed a rapidly increased. Finally, Spain and Norway are fluctuated widely but in the end its showed a fell in 2000 and 2009.

Therefore, in the end of the years only Spain have increased a number of burglary vehicles while other countries showed a drop in a period of 9 years.there are comparison of four country the highest rate of burglary vehicles in year of 2006

Votes
Average: 7.4 (6 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llustrates the information about thieved vehicles in four countries between 2000 ...
^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'burglaries'' or 'burglary's'?
Suggestion: burglaries'; burglary's
...e graph that Great Britain have maximum burglaries vehicle and Greece is dramatically incr...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, so, therefore, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96129032258 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71187315031 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593548387097 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.6886647914 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.125 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270370770327 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108300825207 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115141611908 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174413971415 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095119725726 0.0819641961636 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.