The line graph shows the cost for watching films. The pie charts show the change
in the percentage of market share represented by the three forms
The line graph and pie charts compare the cost of watching films in various ways and the percentage of each during a 6 year period.
It can be inferred that although prices increased in the three formats, an increasing proportion of people started preferring online movies.
As for the prices, buying a cinema ticket had been the most expensive method of watching movies between 2005 and 2011, peaking at £14 per ticket in 2011. Throughout the same period, DVD pricing also rose up by £2, from £6 to £8. Downloaded films, however, were a bit higher than DVDs in 2005, but this did not last till 2007 as they became the cheapest form. In 2011, the price rose again to £9.
With regards to percentages, more than half of the people depended on renting a DVD in year 2005. In that year, less than a third of all accounted for going to the cinema and 6% of them watched online movies. Ltaer in 2011, prices for both cinema tickets and hiring DVDs had fallen, whereas downloaded films soared up by 20%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-06 | celine ayoub | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-22 | nvtd | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-20 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-20 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years 78
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
- The maps below show the changes that occurred to a town named Willington in 1780 1860 and 2000 73
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 73
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, third, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55801104972 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27056363819 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674033149171 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7653485904 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155414918602 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608262853779 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928407261592 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114473445317 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116211128156 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.