The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The depicted line presents the number of tourist in visiting four major attractions in Brighton continuously in more than 2 decades.
It is clear in the first place that both pavilion and festival attraction gained the highest number of visitors compared to both art gallery and pier. Though festival attraction saw higher percentage in 1980 around 25%, Pavilion, however took out the number of visitors in 1985. In addition to that, such attraction saw a tremendous increase for more than just a decade and the number was peaked in 1995 to 50%. As Pavilion saw changes each year, the opposite (Festival Attraction) remained stagnant and was saw an insignificant slight of improvement in 2000.
Other two Brighton’s attractions, Art Gallery and Pier also have something different in comparison. The Art Gallery’s visitors were rocketed from a twentieth only to suffer a continuous decrease for 20 years time of period and was reached its climax in 2010 with less than 15%. This notion was followed by last kind of attraction called Pier which saw several fluctuations around a tenth in three distinctive period started from 1980 to 1995. More than that, such attraction obtained a gradual increase and reached its highest number about more than 20% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | Trần Thị Như Quỳnh | 84 | view |
- The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 73
- The pie chart below show recycling in Sydney Melbourne and Worldwide 87
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 507, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sawed', 'sawn', 'seen'.
Suggestion: sawed; sawn; seen
...al Attraction remained stagnant and was saw an insignificant slight of improvement...
^^^
Line 2, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed stagnant and was saw an insignificant slight of improvement in 2000. Other t...
^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mething different in comparison. The Art Gallery's visitors were rocketed f...
^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arison. The Art Gallery's visitors were rocketed from a twentieth only to s...
^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eriod and was reached its climax in 2010 with less than 15%. This notion was foll...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, in addition, kind of, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13526570048 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83496273331 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599033816425 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.0238738146 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106679220902 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545908872553 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608067382505 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106025333959 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731989163659 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.